top of page

Is the OC Democratic Party Struggling to Contain Their Rising Anti-semitic Faction Within the Party?


Examining the Internal Conflicts and Global Implications of DPOC's Latest Controversial Resolution.


In a move that has raised eyebrows, the Democratic Party of Orange County (DPOC) recently proposed a resolution that starkly criticizes the State of Israel's actions in the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. This development has led to questions about the internal dynamics of the party, specifically regarding its stance on Israel and whether it indicates a growing anti-Israel sentiment within its ranks.


The resolution, co-sponsored by a group of elected Democratic representatives, denounces the killing of civilians by Hamas, Israeli armed settlers, and the Israeli state, accusing Israel of using essential resource deprivation as a weapon against Palestinians in Gaza. The resolution claims that over 20,000 Palestinian lives, including 8,160 children, have been lost, and 1.73 million civilians displaced, figures it says surpass the casualties of the Nakba of 1948.


Furthermore, the resolution accuses Israel of committing genocide and ethnic cleansing, citing indiscriminate bombings in civilian areas and the forced displacement of over 2 million Palestinians from Gaza. These actions, according to the DPOC, are supported by the U.S. through military aid, making American taxpayers complicit in these alleged crimes against humanity.


The DPOC's resolution has been met with intense criticism, by those who argue that the resolution is one-sided, failing to adequately address the complexities of the Israel-Palestine conflict. The resolution's harsh language and accusations against Israel, such as genocide and ethnic cleansing, are viewed as extreme and potentially contributing to the rise of anti-Semitic sentiments.


This situation poses a significant challenge for the Democratic Party of Orange County. The resolution is indicative of a deeper ideological divide within the party, reflecting a growing faction that is openly critical of Israel. This shift represents a departure from the traditionally more balanced stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict and highlights the difficulties the party faces in reconciling these internal differences.


The controversy surrounding this resolution sheds light on the broader national debate within the Democratic Party regarding its foreign policy stance, particularly towards Israel. It raises questions about the party's ability to maintain a unified front on international issues and its approach to handling internal dissent on such sensitive topics.


As the DPOC grapples with these internal conflicts, the implications of its stance extend beyond local politics. The resolution has the potential to influence the Democratic Party's national dialogue on foreign policy, particularly concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict. It underscores the challenges political parties face in addressing complex international issues while maintaining internal cohesion and resonates with broader discussions about the role of the U.S. in the Middle East.


The bill was authored by Mirvette Judeh, AD67, and co-sponsored by Hon. Jose F. Moreno, PhD. (AD68), Hon. Jose Trinidad Castaneda (AD67), Hon. Al Jabbar (AD68), Lyndsey Lefebvre (AD64), Marisol Ramirez (AD68), Hon. Cynthia Aguirre (AD59), Mike Rodriguez (AD68). Sudi Farokhnia (AD72), Marleen Gillespie (AD73), Hon. Jose Paolo Magcalas, Ph.D. (AD67), Hon Juan Gabriel Alvarez (AD68), Naz Hamid (AD73), Isabella Rubio (AD59), Faye Hezar (AD73).



bottom of page