top of page

Santa Ana City Council to Condemn Israel in Resolution, Shocking Jewish Community


Numerous residents alarmed at Santa Ana City Council’s resolution condemning Israel amid the regional conflict.


In an unprecedented move, the Santa Ana City Council is set to adopt a resolution Dec. 5 that vilifies Israel amid the ongoing conflict while conspicuously omitting the role and actions of Hamas, a group internationally recognized as a terrorist organization.


The lack of objectivity in addressing such a contentious and multifaceted issue not only misrepresents the conflict but also undermines the council’s credibility in handling international matters of grave importance, as well as reflects a deep-seated bias that raises serious concerns about the council's approach to international affairs.


The resolution, initiated by Councilmembers Benjamin Vazquez and Johnathan Hernandez, appears to be rooted in a narrative that disproportionately blames Israel for the ongoing conflict. Citing the tragic loss of life in Gaza and the dire humanitarian situation, the resolution calls for an immediate ceasefire, emphasizing the suffering of Palestinian civilians. While the plight of Gazans is undeniable, the resolution fails to acknowledge the complexities of the conflict, including the role of Hamas in perpetuating violence.


Furthermore, the resolution's language suggests a disturbing lack of balance. It details the death toll and destruction in Gaza without equivalent consideration for Israeli lives lost and the impact of Hamas's aggression on Israeli civilians. The text also includes controversial statements that could be perceived as endorsing viewpoints that are widely contested, such as the characterization of Gaza as "the world's largest open-air prison" and allegations of collective punishment and ethnic cleansing by Israel.


The resolution also touches on the United States' role in the conflict, criticizing American financial and military support for Israel. This aspect of the resolution brings into question the council's grasp of the broader geopolitical dynamics and the intricacies of U.S. foreign policy. The decision to focus exclusively on Israeli actions, while ignoring the provocations and attacks by Hamas, presents a skewed picture of the situation.


Many residents, including some of Jewish heritage have also felt alienated as a result of the resolution.


Chanel Barnoy, a Jewish resident, wrote "This resolution appears one-sided, relying on false narratives that unfairly blame Israel in the ongoing conflict. Approving this biased resolution may exacerbate tensions and contribute to an antisemitic atmosphere."


Another comment on the council from resident Deborah Cherem wrote, "This biased resolution does nothing to promote peace or tolerance, it will only serve to further inflame the hate and antisemitic atmosphere now on open display against our Jewish community."


In conclusion, many feel that the city council's proposed resolution represents a concerning departure from a balanced and informed approach to international conflict resolution. It's crucial for public bodies, especially at the municipal level, to strive for a fair and comprehensive understanding of complex global issues. A resolution that fails to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict does a disservice to the cause of peace and to the diverse communities that make up Santa Ana.



Комментарии


bottom of page